Audio: David Glenn on two reasons why the UNC case is a bad fit for the NCAA

Posted Apr 27, 2016
Compared to the notice of allegations handed down to North Carolina by the NCAA last May, the document the school received on Monday was slightly watered down. While the university is still facing five Level I violations and continues to sit under a cloud of uncertainty, the amended NOA was a clear sign that UNC’s attorneys were successful in disputing some of the original charges. (ACC Sports Journal)

Chansky’s Notebook: Money Answers
With the $20.5 million revenue share starting next week, where can UNC get the money to pay football and men’s basketball? Answer: Primarily, it will...
Wed Jun 25, 2025

Video: Locked On Tar Heels - 4 UNC Teams to Receive Revenue Share
UNC's revenue sharing plan takes center stage as host Isaac Schade breaks down the $20.5 million annual distribution across football, basketball, and baseball. The discussion...
Tue Jun 24, 2025

UNC, NC State set to collect share of sports betting tax revenue
North Carolina and NC State, the largest athletic departments in the UNC System, would receive less money from sports betting taxes under the House’s proposed...
Tue Jun 24, 2025

Carolina Athletics Adapting & Evolving After House Settlement
Beginning on July 1 we will fully fund and distribute $20.5 million in revenue share directly to UNC student-athletes. The majority of those funds will...
Mon Jun 23, 2025