Chansky’s Notebook: Options Galore

Posted Jul 8, 2024
What looked like a sure thing for Clemson and FSU is doubtful because the SEC doesn’t want great football programs in small TV markets in states where it already has a large presence. Why share TV revenues with new entries that will be strong competitors to win the SEC but bring little else to the table? The league would rather have UNC and Duke. (Chapelboro.com)

Related: Other News

With NCAA Tournament expansion imminent, some of game's biggest coaches still aren't sold on idea
Even as NCAA power brokers are ready to expand March Madness for the men's and women's tournaments to 76 teams, the idea remains controversial among...
Thu May 7, 2026

Why New NCAA Football Calendar Proposals Make Sense
Greg Barnes discusses the recent proposals by the American Football Coaches Association, which include removing an open date, ending conference championship games, and moving to...
Wed May 6, 2026

ACC Leaning on Initiatives to Keep League Intact
I thought that the revenue gap between the Big 10 and the SEC would be more significant right now than what it is. It’s still...
Wed May 6, 2026

Big Ten miffed about Duke's Amazon deal to broadcast Madison Square Garden game against Michigan
A broadcast dispute is emerging in Duke’s landmark, three-game streaming package with Amazon. The Big Ten has notified the ACC and ESPN that it owns...
Tue May 5, 2026