Menu

Biggest winners and losers from House v. NCAA settlement: Amateurism is dead and class divide grows


The long-awaited House v. NCAA settlement is finally a reality, paving the way for universities to pay their athletes directly starting on July 1. There is a lot to consider in what could be the most consequential day in college sports history. How are schools going to actually pay their athletes? Who will be policing this new revenue share world? (CBS Sports)

Related:

Court denies Tennessee guard Zakai Zeigler’s push for 5th season of eligibility
Tennessee guard Zakai Zeigler’s legal push for a fifth year of collegiate eligibility has been denied. At least for now. In May, Zeigler sued the...

Coaches and international athletes grapple with U.S. visa uncertainties
College coaches and international athletes are stuck in an unnerving limbo, saying they're unsure how to plan for recent changes in U.S. student visa procedures...

House v. NCAA settlement quells issues in college sports? No, but be prepared for new type of chaos
What happened is significant, no doubt. But anybody describing it as a solution to the issues ailing college athletics simply lacks an understanding of the...

ACC’s College World Series Continues Down Perplexing Path
Oddly, three of the programs with the most CWS appearances without ever winning the title are from the ACC: Florida State with 23 trips, Clemson...

Biggest winners and losers from House v. NCAA settlement: Amateurism is dead and class divide grows


© 2005-2025 Tar Heel Times | Contact | Privacy Policy | Site Map | RSS | Did UNC Win?

Tar Heel Times is an unofficial resource for UNC fans and is not affiliated with the University of North Carolina.