Menu

O'Bannon plaintiffs answer judge's questions in written closing


Attorneys for the plaintiffs in the Ed O'Bannon class-action antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA on Wednesday used a written closing statement to clarify a subtle legal argument that could be crucial to their chances of winning the case. They argued that one of the most central issues in the suit is that, realistically, schools in the NCAA's top levels of football and men's basketball are the only places where the best athletes in those sports can participate in college athletics. (USA Today)

Related:

Dick Vitale details his purpose in new book as legendary broadcaster continues cancer fight
Dick Vitale's boisterous and booming voice has served as college basketball's soundtrack for a generation of fans since he began working at ESPN in 1979...

Hunter Dickinson returning to Kansas: Why the All-American is the latest offseason win for Bill Self
Kansas coach Bill Self secured his latest offseason win with the announcement that All-American big man Hunter Dickinson would be returning for the 2024-25 season...

Ovies & Giglio Want Triangle Sports Fans to Keep Arguing Forever
It’s a Thursday in February and Joe Ovies and Joe Giglio are talking about sports. They’re recording from the headquarters of OG Triangle Media: A...

One family was first in line to see Mark Pope. Their feelings sum up a Kentucky fan base.
Hours before Mark Pope was officially introduced as the new head men’s basketball coach at the University of Kentucky on Sunday, the sidewalks outside of...


© 2005-2024 Tar Heel Times | Contact | Privacy Policy | Site Map | RSS | Did UNC Win?

Tar Heel Times is an unofficial resource for UNC fans and is not affiliated with the University of North Carolina.