Menu

$2.8 billion House v. NCAA settlement hangs in balance as attorneys address roster-limit concern


The marathon legal battle regarding player compensation and the makeup of college athletics in a landmark, multibillion-dollar antitrust case may have finally hit the homestretch on Wednesday night. Attorneys involved in a $2.8 billion settlement filed a brief tweaking the aspect of roster limits in the House v. NCAA settlement. (CBS Sports)

Related:

With NCAA Tournament expansion imminent, some of game's biggest coaches still aren't sold on idea
Even as NCAA power brokers are ready to expand March Madness for the men's and women's tournaments to 76 teams, the idea remains controversial among...

Why New NCAA Football Calendar Proposals Make Sense
Greg Barnes discusses the recent proposals by the American Football Coaches Association, which include removing an open date, ending conference championship games, and moving to...

ACC Leaning on Initiatives to Keep League Intact
I thought that the revenue gap between the Big 10 and the SEC would be more significant right now than what it is. It’s still...

Big Ten miffed about Duke's Amazon deal to broadcast Madison Square Garden game against Michigan
A broadcast dispute is emerging in Duke’s landmark, three-game streaming package with Amazon. The Big Ten has notified the ACC and ESPN that it owns...

$2.8 billion House v. NCAA settlement hangs in balance as attorneys address roster-limit concern