UNC And The NCAA: A Defendable Case For The University
Posted Jun 10, 2015
There's no way that the NCAA would have made a case solely on the bungled statements of debunked "whistle blower" Mary Willingham, whose credibility was shot down by an independent investigation by the University of Virginia, Minnesota and Georgia State. Nor would the NCAA have gotten in bed with Rashad McCants, whose factually-challenged charges came with ulterior motives laced with green.
(Tar Heel Illustrated)
Related: Business & Administration
Video: Next Level Podcast - House Settlement Approved - A New Era for UNC, NCAACollege athletics took another step into the new world with the final approval of the House vs. NCAA settlement following court battles over athlete compensation...
Wed Jun 11, 2025Greg Barnes: House Settlement Approval Finalizes Shifting Collegiate Landscape
College athletics is now officially big business for student-athletes after decades of institutions being the primary beneficiaries. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken approved the House...
Mon Jun 9, 2025
Video: Locked On Tar Heels - House Settlement Reshapes College Sports, UNC Embraces Revenue Sharing
It's a college athletics revolution: Direct payments to student-athletes are now allowed. Is this the end of amateurism in NCAA sports? Host Isaac Schade breaks...
Mon Jun 9, 2025
Chansky’s Notebook: The Driver
Schools with the most money will continue to grow their wealth and keep ahead of the competition. UNC Development has raised billions of dollars, but...
Thu Jun 5, 2025